Revisability of convictions

What it is: Agnosticism tends to treat metaphysical convictions as revisable in light of new arguments, experiences, or critiques.

How the position understands it: Openness to revision is seen as an intellectual virtue, avoiding premature closure in positive or negative dogmas.

Basis and context: This attitude dialogues with philosophical fallibilism and the scientific practice of public correction.

Debates and variations: Some agnostics consider it only method; others transform it into a permanent existential posture.

Supportive

Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

agnosticism,carl-sagan,skepticism,evidence

A defense of skepticism and critical examination of extraordinary claims.

Reference: Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World.
Content: Sagan popularizes the idea that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and values critical investigation.
Use in debate: It is widely used to justify epistemic caution and revisable openness.

Karl Popper, Conjectures and Refutations

agnosticism,popper,fallibilism,revision

An important source for fallibilism and critical revision.

Reference: Karl Popper, Conjectures and Refutations.
Content: Popper defends knowledge as a process of criticizable hypotheses and continuous correction.
Use in debate: Although not a classic treatment of God, it helps support the revisability of convictions.

T. H. Huxley, Agnosticism

agnosticism,huxley,definition,epistemology

The classic text that popularized the modern term.

Reference: T. H. Huxley, essays on agnosticism.
Content: Huxley describes agnosticism as a method of not affirming as certain what cannot be adequately demonstrated.
Use in debate: It is the most important modern reference for the historical definition of the term.