Rejection of the pope's universal primacy
The communion does not recognize the bishop of Rome as having universal jurisdiction over the whole Church.
What it is: This belief rejects the idea that the bishop of Rome possesses immediate and universal jurisdictional authority over the entire Church.
How the tradition understands it: The Oriental Orthodox churches acknowledge the historical importance of ancient Rome, but do not accept the papal formulation developed in the West. Ecclesial authority is conceived in synodal and patriarchal terms.
Textual or traditional basis: The ancient practice of the apostolic sees, the autonomy of the Eastern churches, and the post-Chalcedonian historical experience are central.
Historical context: Institutional distance from Rome was further consolidated by the post-Chalcedonian separation and by distinct political trajectories.
Common objections: Catholics argue that the full unity of the Church requires a universal Petrine center.
Internal variations: The tone used to describe the historical relationship with Rome may vary, but rejection of universal primacy is common.
Supportive
Constitution of the modern Oriental Orthodox Communion
A contemporary description of the churches of the communion.
Reference: Modern institutional presentations of the Oriental Orthodox communion.
Content: These descriptions identify the member churches, their autonomy, and their common non-Chalcedonian heritage.
Use in debate: They are useful for presenting the communion as a living ecclesial reality rather than a mere historical residue of ancient controversies.
Contrary
Matthew 16:18-19
A text used in debates about Peter and primacy.
Reference: Matthew 16:18-19.
Content: Jesus speaks to Peter about the Church and the keys.
Use in debate: Catholics use the text in favor of Roman primacy; Oriental Orthodox reject a reading of universal papal jurisdiction based on it.
Neutral
John 17:20-23
Christ's prayer for unity.
Reference: John 17:20-23.
Content: Jesus prays for the unity of his followers.
Use in debate: It is frequently cited in ecumenical dialogues and reflections on communion and historical division.