Anatta, absence of substantial self
There is no permanent, independent, immutable self in the aggregates of experience.
What it is: Anatta, or anatman, is the teaching that there is no permanent and substantial self to be found in the aggregates of experience.
How the tradition understands it: The person is seen as a conditioned set of physical and mental processes. This teaching seeks to undo attachment to a fixed identity and support liberation.
Textual basis and context: The ancient discourses of the canon present this analysis in strong contrast with substantialist conceptions of the self.
Debates and variations: The exact way of formulating the absence of self, personal continuity, and relation with rebirth has generated many discussions among ancient and later schools.
Supportive
Anattalakkhana Sutta
A classical discourse on the absence of self in the aggregates.
Reference: Saṃyutta Nikāya 22.59.
Content: The text examines the aggregates and concludes that they should not be taken as self or as belonging to a self.
Use in debate: It is the most cited classical source for anatta.
Dhammapada 279
All dhammas are not-self.
Reference: Dhammapada 279.
Content: The verse declares the absence of a substantial self in dhammas.
Use in debate: It reinforces the doctrine of not-self in memorable language.
Milindapanha
A classical dialogue on identity, continuity, and not-self.
Reference: Milindapañha.
Content: The dialogue uses famous metaphors, such as the chariot, to discuss personal continuity without a substantial self.
Use in debate: It is very useful for explaining anatta and ethical continuity.
Contrary
Dhammapada 279
A comparative Buddhist source on the absence of self.
Reference: Dhammapada 279.
Content: The Buddhist verse formulates the absence of self in dhammas.
Use in debate: It is useful in comparison because Jainism, by contrast, affirms the reality of the soul.
Neutral
Bodhisattva precepts in Zen
Zen ethics includes vows and precepts of moral responsibility.
Reference: Ordination formulas and bodhisattva precepts in Zen communities.
Content: The material articulates not killing, not deceiving, not exploiting, and other ethical responsibilities.
Use in debate: It is central to ethics and compassion in the tradition.