Acceptance of the first three ecumenical councils
Nicaea, Constantinople I, and Ephesus are received as normative ecumenical councils.
What it is: This belief affirms the normative authority of the councils of Nicaea (325), Constantinople I (381), and Ephesus (431).
How the tradition understands it: These councils are seen as valid expressions of the apostolic faith regarding God, Christ, and the Church. They structure the doctrinal orthodoxy received by the Oriental Orthodox churches.
Textual or traditional basis: The Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed, patristic reception, and the conciliar decisions of these gatherings are central.
Historical context: Acceptance of these three councils stands in contrast to the non-reception of Chalcedon and the later councils of the Chalcedonian imperial axis.
Common objections: Critics ask why the same conciliar logic would not extend to Chalcedon and the councils that followed.
Internal variations: Acceptance of these three councils is broadly stable throughout the communion.
Supportive
Council of Ephesus (431)
Council received as Christological and Mariological authority.
Reference: Council of Ephesus, 431.
Content: The council confirmed the legitimacy of the title Theotokos and rejected readings perceived as dividing the person of Christ.
Use in debate: It is one of the conciliar pillars of non-Chalcedonian Oriental Orthodoxy.
Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed
Common symbol of faith from the early councils.
Reference: Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed.
Content: The symbol summarizes the Christian faith concerning God, Christ, the Holy Spirit, the Church, and the resurrection.
Use in debate: It is a common reference in the reception of the first three ecumenical councils.