Master-disciple transmission

Lineage and recognition by a master carry great weight in the continuity of the tradition.

50%

Confidence

Supportive

Contrary

Neutral

What it is: The transmission of Dharma articulates historical continuity, validation of training, and belonging to a lineage.

How the tradition understands it: The bond with a master is not mere formalism, but a path of correction, accompaniment, and insertion into a living tradition.

Textual basis and context: Genealogies, monastery records, and enlightenment narratives preserve this centrality.

Debates and variations: The theme is also sensitive in contemporary discussions about authority and abuse of power.

Supportive

Dokusan and interview with the teacher

zen-buddhism,dokusan,teacher,training

Formal meetings between disciple and teacher guide correction and deepening.

Reference: The practice of dokusan or sanzen in Zen contexts.
Content: The meeting allows evaluation of practice, koans, and spiritual counsel.
Use in debate: It is relevant for transmission and the teacher’s authority.

Keizan and the Soto expansion

zen-buddhism,keizan,soto,lineage

Keizan contributes decisively to the institutional consolidation of Soto.

Reference: The life and writings of Keizan Jokin.
Content: The tradition views him as a major organizer and diffuser of Japanese Soto.
Use in debate: It is important for lineages and institutional history.

Contrary

Debates on authority and abuse

zen-buddhism,authority,ethics,abuse

The teacher-disciple relationship is also subject to contemporary critical review.

Reference: Modern discussions in Zen communities about ethics and authority.
Content: The material questions idealized views of the teacher when disconnected from moral responsibility and transparency.
Use in debate: It is important as a contemporary interpretive tension.