Endogamy and community structure
Religious belonging is traditionally closed and regulated by community rules.
What it is: Yazidism is traditionally an endogamous religion, with strong community control over marriage and belonging.
How the tradition understands it: Marriage outside the community is usually seen as a serious break in religious continuity. The tradition also preserves internal distinctions between religious and social groups.
Basis and context: Endogamy, internal hierarchy, and reserve before external conversions are linked to the search for identity preservation.
Debates and variations: In recent diasporas, debates emerge about flexibilization, ethnic identity, and criteria of belonging.
Supportive
Christine Allison on Yazidi practice and identity
Christine Allison's literature emphasizes practice, memory, and community identity.
Reference: Academic works by Christine Allison on Yazidi religion and culture.
Content: Her analyses highlight orality, Kurdishophone identity, community norms, and the importance of describing religion from its practice.
Use in debate: Useful source for purity, endogamy, and oral transmission.
Encyclopaedia Iranica, Yazidis i. General
A reference academic study on Yazidi identity, practice, and beliefs.
Reference: Encyclopaedia Iranica, article 'Yazidis i. General,' by Christine Allison.
Content: It highlights the importance of orthopraxy, religious purity, metempsychosis, and communal organization.
Use in debate: It is one of the most cited academic sources for a general description of Yezidism.
Khanna Omarkhali, The Yezidi Religious Textual Tradition
A reference study on the textualization and canonization of Yazidi oral traditions.
Reference: Khanna Omarkhali, The Yezidi Religious Textual Tradition: From Oral to Written.
Content: It examines textual categories, oral transmission, written recording, and disputes over textual authority.
Use in debate: It is central for understanding the qewls and the caution needed toward a simplified written canon.
Neutral
Omarkhali on Orality and Canonization
The shift from oral to written forms changed how the religion was presented in the modern period.
Reference: Studies by Khanna Omarkhali on orality, writing, and canonization.
Content: The material shows that the recent textualization of the tradition does not eliminate the central role of oral performance nor automatically resolve internal divergences.
Use in debate: It is a key source on the status of the qewls and of disputed written texts.
Taboo on the Name Satan in Ethnographic Descriptions
The avoidance of certain terms appears in ethnographic descriptions and polemics.
Reference: Ethnographic descriptions on avoiding the term Satan and associated vocabulary.
Content: The custom is often misinterpreted by outside observers, but in the internal context it relates to linguistic taboos and ritual purity.
Use in debate: It is important for correcting the accusation of 'devil worship.'