Critical reason and evidence
Beliefs and policies should be evaluated with critical thinking and attention to evidence.
What it is: Secular humanism values the use of critical reason, informed debate, and public evidence in forming beliefs and collective decisions.
How the position understands it: Authorities must be questionable, and arguments must be examined in open public space.
Basis and context: This attitude dialogues with Enlightenment, modern science, secular education, and democratic culture.
Debates and variations: Some authors warn against reducing all human life to technical rationality; the ideal continues to be critical reason combined with ethical sensitivity.
Supportive
Humanist Manifesto I (1933)
A classic manifesto of organized modern humanism.
Reference: Humanist Manifesto I (1933).
Content: The document presents a non-supernaturalist humanist vision with emphasis on reason, social ethics, and cultural reconstruction.
Use in debate: It is an important milestone in the modern formulation of organized humanism.
Paul Kurtz, What Is Secular Humanism?
An influential explanation of modern secular humanism.
Reference: Paul Kurtz, essays such as What Is Secular Humanism?.
Content: Kurtz articulates ethics, reason, science, freedom, and human responsibility without appeal to an obligatory supernatural realm.
Use in debate: It is a central source for the contemporary definition of the movement.
UNESCO and education for global citizenship
Critical education, cooperation, and civic responsibility.
Reference: UNESCO documents on education and global citizenship.
Content: The materials emphasize critical thinking, democratic coexistence, rights, and shared responsibility.
Use in debate: They are useful for critical education and responsibility for the common world.
Neutral
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Humanism
An academic synthesis of concepts and the history of humanism.
Reference: Academic entry on humanism in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Content: The text summarizes historical, philosophical, and ethical variants of humanism.
Use in debate: It is a useful neutral reference for conceptual classification.