Authority of Scripture read with spiritual discernment
The Bible is highly valued, but its reading is accompanied by the living guidance of the Spirit.
What it is: Historical Quakerism gives great value to the Bible, but resists a purely literalist reading disconnected from the living experience of the Spirit.
How the tradition understands it: For many Friends, Scripture witnesses to revelation and must be read in the light of the same Spirit that inspired its origin. This avoids both contempt for the Bible and the idea that the text works in isolation without spiritual discernment.
Basis and context: The classical position was formulated in polemic with established churches and with groups accused of disordered enthusiasm.
Debates and variations: There are differences between more biblicist-confessional evangelical Quakers and more liberal Quakers open to interreligious language.
Supportive
2 Timothy 3:16-17
An important passage for the authority of Scripture.
Reference: 2 Timothy 3:16-17.
Content: The text speaks of the inspiration and usefulness of the Scriptures for moral and doctrinal formation.
Use in debate: It is especially relevant for Friends who wish to show the movement's biblical continuity.
Robert Barclay, Apology, Proposition 3
Barclay deals with the Scriptures and their relation to living revelation.
Reference: Robert Barclay, Apology, Proposition 3.
Content: Barclay affirms great authority to the Scriptures, but distinguishes the text from the living principle of divine revelation itself.
Use in debate: It is a classic source for the Quaker relation between Bible and Spirit.
Neutral
George Fox, Journal
George Fox's diary is one of the central primary sources of the early movement.
Reference: George Fox's Journal.
Content: The text narrates spiritual experiences, travels, imprisonments, debates, and fundamental formulations of the early Friends movement.
Use in debate: It is a central source for the inner light, worship, critique of clericalism, and ethical witness.